"Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment" is not related to "Prisoner's Dilemma". Consider "Prisoner's Dilemma" some more.
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist at Stanford University. The experiment intended to study the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard.
I have had time to consider the topic more deeply, and I am going to put forth an argument that it is not related to Prisoner's Dilemma. The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist at Stanford University.
The experiment intended to study the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. The participants were randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.
Prisoners and guards were not told about the purpose of the experiment beforehand.
The participants adapted to their roles well beyond Zimbardo's expectations, as the guards enforced authoritarian measures and eventually subjected some of the prisoners to psychological torture. Many of the prisoners passively accepted psychological abuse and, at the request of the guards, readily harassed other prisoners who attempted to prevent it.
The experiment even affected Zimbardo, who, in his capacity as the superintendent, allowed the abuses to occur. Two of the prisoners quit the experiment early.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.