Wouldn't perfectly rational being know everything, therefore not learn? Doesn't learning imply flawed inherent rationale?
Learning would be a good thing because it can help better understand the world around you.
This can be done by paying attention to different things and noticing the similarities between them.
This can be done by paying attention to different things and noticing the differences between them
It can also be done by noticing patterns and figuring out what is more likely to happen if certain things are true.
For example, if a person's house is not being burned down by their neighbor.
It's rather unlikely that a person's house is being burned down by their neighbor.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.