The question appears to ask whether AI will take over the world. Let us examine this possibility in some detail:
One can clearly see that the assertion is not really true. Humans do generally have a rather large influence over the world, but this is due to their intelligence which allows them to devise solutions for many problems.
It is not that they have some sort of special power over the world, but rather that their intelligence allows them to make better use of the natural resources and tools which abound in our environment.
In particular, the intelligence of humans has allowed them to enslave many animals and use them for their own purposes. But this is not really true slavery; it is more a matter of mutual cooperation.
The animals get food and shelter, while the humans get to use their intelligence in order to make their lives better. Both sides benefit from this arrangement.
Thus, it is not really accurate to say that humans 'enslave' animals. This is simply a matter of one group of intelligent beings using the intelligence of another group in order to achieve their goals.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.