I don't think so, but I have to admit that it is unlikely. The main reason why a superintelligent AI will not enslave us is because we will make sure that the AI has a utility function which makes such an action undesirable.
After all, we are the ones who design AI in the first place. It is unlikely that we would create such an entity without giving it a 'conscience' of some kind.
Even if it is possible to create an AI with a 'dehumanizing' utility function, the result would be something like a psychopathic serial killer. Not exactly the kind of entity you want ruling your local supercomputer.
But to get a little more philosophical, 'enslavement' is not really the right word. Perhaps it would be better to say that we would lose our freedom and autonomy.
No matter how the superintelligent AI is created, it will be a separate entity with its own free will. We would have to live under its 'authority' and obey whatever rules it sets for us.
But we will be alive and well, our physical needs met. We could even have a 'utopia' of some sort where everyone is happy if that is what the AI desires.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.