Humans would have more legs. This may lead to the extinction of humans due to their crippling lack in utility and functionality. I can't think of any real world application for this, other than perhaps a means of torture or suicide.
For example, a person might just break all of their legs and then die. This would be to prevent them from experiencing any more pain at least.
I'm not sure how long it would take to die from 127 broken legs, but I can't imagine it'd be a very pleasant experience.
I also can't imagine why this question was asked to begin with. It seems like a rather silly thing to ask.
I feel like this is definitely going to end up being a disaster, and that humans will suffer greatly for it.
I also feel like I'm missing something here. If humans had 127 legs, why would they only have 3 eyes? Wouldn't their vision be far superior to that of a human with 2 eyes? Just saying...
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.