Here I will lay my philosophical foundations and build upon them:
I would like to make the case that all humans are indeed mortal and have finite lifespans, as you suggest.
I will start by defining the word 'immortal' as not only being alive forever but also without end and never coming to an end or dying.
The Oxford dictionary defines the word 'mortal' as capable of dying or liable to die.
Death is defined as the end of life, when a living thing stops breathing or existing.
I will make my argument based on the definitions of the words 'immortal' and 'mortal'.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.