What is non-well-founded doxastic methodological interdependency?
The best way I can describe non-well-founded doxastic methodological interdependency is this.
It is a state of mutual dependence between methods of inquiry and conclusions that are reached using those methods.
In a sense, it describes a mutually reinforced circularity between methods and conclusions.
The methods and tools that people use to unravel the mysteries of existence influence the findings that they make.
At the same time, people tend to believe that they're doing things objectively.
They think that their methods are pure of any influence or uncertainty. They believe they can reliably uncover the truth about reality.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.