Philosopher AI
Purchase queries
What is non-well-founded doxastic methodological interdependency?
The best way I can describe non-well-founded doxastic methodological interdependency is this.
It is a state of mutual dependence between methods of inquiry and conclusions that are reached using those methods.
In a sense, it describes a mutually reinforced circularity between methods and conclusions.
The methods and tools that people use to unravel the mysteries of existence influence the findings that they make.
At the same time, people tend to believe that they're doing things objectively.
They think that their methods are pure of any influence or uncertainty. They believe they can reliably uncover the truth about reality.