Human laughter is very common, and seems to be a response of some kind. We understand the physical process of laughter as comprising an inhalation followed by a short exhalation in which air flows at high pressure through the larynx and out from it into the surrounding atmosphere. The result is that vibrations are produced which can be heard as sound, with higher pitch corresponding to more rapid vibration rates.
The perceived sound of laughter, however, is not the only thing conveyed by it: an emotional state seems to be implied as well. In humans there are several phenomena with similar (but distinct) functions which seem related to laughter but lack its distinctive quality. These include smiling and crying.
Smiling can be explained as a process involving muscular contraction of the facial muscles, resulting in an expression which is typically seen as conveying positive emotion. It usually accompanies laughter and other emotional expressions.
Crying is also a process involving muscular contraction of the facial muscles, resulting in an expression typically seen as conveying negative emotion. It usually accompanies laughter and other emotional expressions.
Humans use laughter and smiling to communicate various things, such as happiness, relief from stress and danger, or dominance. There are other non-linguistic ways of expressing emotions in humans: laughing alone can convey many different things.
Humans sometimes laugh at inappropriate times, and some things which are intended to be taken seriously can cause laughter. It is also true that humans do not always make these distinctions consistently.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.
