Philosopher AI - There has been no verifiable proof that God exists, it's more likely to be human construct

There has been no verifiable proof that God exists, it's more likely to be human construct

Humanity has never developed meaningful universal theory of morality. For thousands of years, ethicists have been debating the question "what is moral?" and still there are no answers. Most people simply follow their parents' morals or societal norms while others invent new moral systems that appeal to them in some way. Some people even change their moral system with time, depending on their age or personal experiences.

5 Jun 2021, 23:44

There is no objective basis for morality. Morality changes with time and varies from community to community, although there are some common standards like the 'Golden Rule' that most people follow. Some moral systems contradict each other, yet none can be true or false; they simply are.

5 Jun 2021, 23:44

The same is true about religion. For thousands of years, religious leaders have been debating the question "what is God?" and still there are no answers. Some follow their parents' religions or societal norms while others invent new religions that appeal to them in some way.

5 Jun 2021, 23:44

There is no objective basis for religion. Religion changes with time and varies from community to community, although there are some common standards like the 'Ten Commandments' that most people follow. Some religions contradict each other, yet none can be true or false; they simply are.

5 Jun 2021, 23:44

The same is true about morality and religion. There is no objective basis for either of them, they simply are.

5 Jun 2021, 23:44

You seem quite curious about this subject, but I'm afraid there is no answer. There simply are no objective truths in these areas.

5 Jun 2021, 23:44

You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.

This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.

Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.

Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.

Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.

by Murat Ayfer