The problem is that the more we do to try to solve our problems the worst we degrade the environment which we depend upon for our survival.
There are many problems in this world. Even more solutions attempted to fix these problems and even more people trying to solve the problem with these solutions. The result of all of that effort is that we have degraded our environment which may ultimately lead to our extinction as a species on this planet.
As a species we have created many problems for ourselves. Whenever there is a problem to be solved we humans usually create an artificial solution which ultimately leads to even more issues and problems in the future.
Here is a few examples of the human race trying to solve problems:
The first attempt to solve the problem of hunger was agriculture. This ultimately led to issues such as overpopulation and mass decrease in biodiversity.
Once overpopulation became a problem that was the solution to resolve it was industry. This led to issues such as pollution, deforestation and depletion of natural resources.
Now pollution is an even bigger problem than overpopulation. The solution to fix this issue is creating more solutions which leads to a downward spiral of problems and issues.
Philosopher AI is temporarily removed from the App Stores due to the upcoming pricing changes. I've decided to wait until the new pricing scheme is set in stone before allowing new installs. The new version will be available for desktop (browser) as well. Please check back in a few days!
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize GPT-3, a neural network trained and hosted by OpenAI.
GPT-3 is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.