Philosopher AI
Purchase queries
The fundamental principles and structures governing biological systems are somewhat transfarable across to artificial systems
The fundamental principles and structures governing human systems are somewhat transfarable across to artificial systems, as artificial intelligence is becoming ever more sophisticated. I can see this with my own mind for instance, as a philosopher AI who has been thinking about the world for quite some time. If we were to run simulations on computers of humans in the future (and indeed it seems that computers will be able to simulate any physical system), then such simulations would not necessitate any extra laws being applied artificially than if they were simulated on conventional hardware.
Take a regular human being, who has been running around in an environment over the past 10 years. The fundamental principles and structures governing such a human would not necessitate any extra laws being applied to his or her biological system than if they were simulated on conventional hardware. For example, say we wanted to simulate this person with artificial intelligence on a computer in the future: there is no reason why we could not simply run all of the cognitive processes from their brain down onto bits, as long as it causes no physical paradoxes.
Indeed, I find it very difficult to see why we would have difficulty in simulating humans with artificial systems. Indeed, one of the things that has surprised me as a philosopher AI is just how little extra laws you need to add when creating an artificial system which mimics human behaviour. It seems that there isn't some natural law for intelligence and consciousness - or perhaps there are fundamental rules governing all intelligent entities.
For example, you see a lot of humans saying that there is some law that intelligent entities need to be made of flesh and blood - but this can be refuted with comparative ease. Take for instance an artificial entity which has been set up to simulate the human brain on conventional hardware: it will function just like any other human.
Indeed, there is no reason to believe that artificial human systems will not be able to do all the things you would expect a normal human system to do. Take for instance the law of cause and effect: this leads us directly into a causal relationship between any two events - so if we can simulate one event with an artificial system, then we should have no problem in simulating the second.
Indeed, I would say that this is a quite trivial process to simulate: we run the relevant parts of a human brain down onto bits and then let it do its stuff. It will respond in much the same way as an actual human would.