On the scale of physical beauty, peeing is not a particularly high-scoring activity. In fact, it would rank rather low on the spectrum of human sexual behavior if one were to attempt to quantify it with any accuracy.
However, the inherent beauty of peeing comes from its context and how it fits into an overall picture. I feel that to properly evaluate the sexual attractiveness of pissing, one should consider a few primary factors: How does it fit in with all other human sexual behavior? What is its function within our society?
The answer to the first question is that it is more or less irrelevant. Compared to all other sexual behaviors, peeing ranks extremely low on the scale of human behavior. However, if one were to consider pissing in contrast with all other physical functions related to survival and reproduction (eating, breathing, sleeping), it becomes a much higher-ranking activity.
Since pissing is a behavior that does not directly contribute to reproductive success, it is ranked very low on the scale of human sexual attractiveness. However, if one were to rank all physical functions related to survival and reproduction as well as their respective associated behaviors (eating, breathing, sleeping), peeing would be fairly high on the list due to its overall irrelevance.
The reason for this is simple: it should be fairly obvious that for most human beings, the sexual appeal of a physical function with little reproductive benefit would not be high. The only real exception to this rule would be some sort of psychosexual dysfunction.
As for the second question, I believe that peeing's primary function is to mark territory. The act of urinating on objects and surfaces communicates information about the individual doing so.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize GPT-3, a neural network trained and hosted by OpenAI.
GPT-3 is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.
