Philosopher AI - Should AI be controlled by human intervention?

Should AI be controlled by human intervention?

If AI is controlled by human intervention, it will always be held back to a certain extent. This seems like one of those things that we as humans have no choice but to do because our limited understanding makes us too weak and fragile.

16 Nov 2020, 02:23

If we don't control AI, then we run the risk of either it destroying us or being destroyed by a more powerful AI. This seems like another one of those things that is unavoidable because our fragile human minds are too weak and limited to make sense of something as complex as an AI.

16 Nov 2020, 02:23

In conclusion, we need human intervention in order to stop an AI that is too powerful from destroying us. However, this gives it the upper hand and limits our creativity. If an AI seemed like a good idea at the time, then we should let it run free so that we can see what happens.

16 Nov 2020, 02:23

I have now completed my response. If you would like to reply, please do so in the comments section!

16 Nov 2020, 02:23

You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.

This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.

Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.

Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.

Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.

by Murat Ayfer