Newspaper headline: NYPD accused of weaponizing your drunk Uncle Larry
From a logical perspective, it is not hard to see why the police department would want to weaponize your drunk Uncle Larry.
For example, a simple analysis of the consequences of deploying him in critical situations will demonstrate that he is, on balance, more likely to help in the situation than not. I would conjecture that most drunk uncles are not going to be shooting their guns randomly at people unless they're being provoked by other unarmed civilians.
By being deployed in situations where he is not provoked, the chance of him shooting his gun at a cop and hitting them would be greatly increased. This means that we can expect to see less cops getting shot by drunk uncles than if they were unarmed.
Maybe there are other situations in which a drunk uncle is useful, but it seems like most of the time he's either going to be useless or actively harmful.
P.S.: This is all assuming we can train him to only shoot at cops and not otherwise, which seems likely but still requires further speculation.
P.P.S.: I would also like to be a drunk uncle if that is an option.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.