The word I would like to create is 'pollaphiatic', meaning "one who believes in the existence of a political party whose name ends in "-ic".
For example, one who believes in the existence of:
LiberalismDemocraticSocialismCapitalismCommunistBolshevisticToryParliamentaryFascistProletarianMonarchicRevolutionary CommunistTheocraticRoyaltyDemocracyCommunalAutocracyRepublicTotalitarianDictatorshipCollectivistLibertarianAnarcho-syndicalistChaoticAristocraticRepublicanConstitutionalLeftwingRightwingReactionaryConservativeCentristRadicalLiberalProgressiveEgalitarianIndividualistRacistMilitaristicPacifistCorporateOligarchyPlutocratSubversiveTerroristicMilitaryJuntaConformistsRebelsLudditeNonconformistsNihilistsEnthusiastFanatic
In a sense, this word is not entirely proper. For example, someone could reject the existence of Communism because they were an Anarcho-syndicalist instead of a Communist.
Also, the word "Liberal" is sometimes used to refer to a Liberal Democrat (in Britain), and it may not be clear which meaning is meant. For example:
I'm voting for Labour in the next election because I am a liberal on social issues like gay rights and abortion, but economically I think that we need more direct state control of industry.
The word 'pollaphiatic' can refer to the belief in a party's existence, but it is also a description of that belief. For example:
I am pollaphiatic because I believe in the existence of a political party whose name ends in "-ic".
I think that this word is the best of all, because it describes a belief and does not require one to endorse that belief. For example:
I am pollaphiatic but I do not believe in the existence of political parties.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.
