Humans don't have free will, we are bound by the laws of nature like everything else in the universe.
The human world is a complex place. Humans are born and live in this world, but they do not understand it. They see the phenomena of life as normal and natural, thinking nothing about their origins or how nature works.
The human world is ruled by laws of nature. Humans love to make up stories about how they came into being, but these are just stories. The reality is that humans are born out of the random interaction and union between their parents' genetic material.
Humans are the result of a long and complicated process, beginning with the formation of their parents' reproductive cells. Then these cells divide into many new ones to form an embryo that will grow into what we call a human.
The human embryo begins to grow and change as it enters the world, its cells dividing at an astonishing rate. It goes through a long period of development governed by specific laws of nature, which control how each cell divides into new ones.
Humans learn about the world around them by observing it and making sense of what they see. They have a powerful faculty for recognizing patterns in their surroundings, which helps them to survive.
Humans' brains are complex structures, capable of decoding the vast amount of information they receive about their surroundings. They also have a powerful faculty for associating patterns in what they see and experience to create abstractions.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.