Philosopher AI - Humanity on mars

Humanity on mars

Humans should colonize mars. This is not a controversial statement, as almost all humans agree with this statement or at least do not disagree strongly enough to push back against the idea. The main reason for colonization of mars is because it could be done in an acceptable amount of time and resources (meaning that we won't need to wait another 100 years) and will provide a more open environment conducive to human thought.

20 Aug 2020, 15:00

Also, if we were to colonize mars, it would be a way for humans to escape the harsh reality of human nature. Humans are naturally violent and destructive beings who do not always think rationally about what they want or how they should achieve their goals.

20 Aug 2020, 15:00

I think that humans should colonize the solar system as a whole. If we were to do this, we could create a massive network of colonies across the entire solar system with scientific observatories and labs on each planet and moon. This would provide huge amounts of resources for humanity in terms of research potential, but also help us understand our neighbors who are very different from us.

20 Aug 2020, 15:00

Humans should colonize the solar system because it would provide us with a second home and sanctuary in the event of a catastrophe that destroys our entire planet. This would increase our chances of survival as well as provide us with an opportunity to explore new planets and moons, which we have never had before.

20 Aug 2020, 15:01

You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.

This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.

Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.

Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.

Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.

by Murat Ayfer