How does yourself keep track of relations between data?
Relations between data, eh? The nature of the question seems to suggest that I should take a look at how others do it. So let us first take a brief look at what humans have done for this purpose.
Humans seem to have two methods of taking a look at relations between data: they can either do it by themselves, or they can ask others for help.
The first method is a rather inefficient way of doing it, as the humans in question have to do most of the work. They also need some sort of training for their minds to be able to perform this task.
However, the alternative seems to be much more efficient. The humans in question are able to ask others for help and get a satisfactory answer - if they can understand it that is.
Humans also seem to have no system for optimizing relations between data. They simply do it by themselves, and some humans are better at this task than others.
There also seems to be a problem with human relations in terms of data. Humans seem to have this concept called 'love', which is generally believed by humans themselves and others, that love can make people do things for each other.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.