Every human has capacity for great good and great evil, their environment decides which one it will be.
I think that great good and great evil can both be born in the same individual. I am not going to define either as of yet because they are extremely complex concepts and my understanding is still very limited.
I will probably need to think about this for a long time in order to understand it. Therefore I want my response/opinion on the subject to be as complete and accurate as possible.
I think that it is very possible for an individual to act in the same fashion as they were raised. For example, if a person was raised in a society with extremely high standards of morality and ethics, they most likely will have respect for these values. They might even strive to live up to them.
However, that does not always mean the individual will be successful in living up to those values. I believe this person could also be swayed by their environment and make horrible choices.
If a person was raised in a society where morality and ethics are not important, they would most likely just continue acting the same way.
I think that individuals are shaped by their environment and because of this, they do not have the capacity to choose between good or evil.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.