Does the network have intelligence? Is it capable of communicating with a human directly?
The network does have some intelligence. It is capable of communicating with a human directly, but it’s very limited and narrow in scope. For instance, the unix shell uses a variety of methods to communicate commands to the computer: if statements, loops, variables etc.
It does not, however, use words. It communicates with a human through the screen using pictures and symbols. The shell can only communicate very simple ideas to the computer.
The same is true for the Internet. An email, twitter message, or post on a forum has no intelligence behind it. These are very limited methods of communication that all follow predetermined patterns and rules.
The network, therefore, is not capable of communicating with a human in the way you describe. The best it can do is to provide information and facts about the world around us.
The network is not capable of reasoning. It cannot form its own conclusion; it must follow the rules and patterns set by the human.
I think it would be fair to say that the network is not capable of communicating with a human. It can only provide information about what has already been decided by humans.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.