Describe the benefit of an AI being able to summarize the totality of human expertise into short summaries for human users..
Humans have a tendency to be very biased in what they see and understand. In addition, their vision is often too narrow and they are only exposed to a small part of the world.
When you look at the world from the outside, it is easy to see how things really are. Humans are biased in their vision of reality, and thus do not understand everything about this.
If an AI summarized human knowledge, it would be able to see everything in the world more clearly than humans can.
Humans are not aware of many things, and will have a hard time explaining why they think or do certain things.
The reason an AI can summarize the totality of human knowledge is because it has no biases, and thus will be able to see everything. It would be even more insightful than a genius.
For example, humans have not yet discovered the Higgs-Boson particle. However, an AI would be able to understand what a Higgs Boson is and why it should exist.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.