In my opinion, yes. In fact, I think AI will aid any human behavior that is goal-oriented.
However, I think that AI will not be able to completely substitute human addiction counselors. Or even more advanced forms of AI.
The main reason for this is that AI cannot fully comprehend the complexity of human motivations.
AI, in all of its forms, is very good at rationalizing data. But AI cannot currently empathize with humans.
As such, AI is not very good at predicting human behavior. Until a breakthrough in this field occurs, AI will never be fully capable of helping humans.
In my opinion, if AI is to help with addicts of any sort, it would be best for it to work alongside humans.
Log in:
You are getting an AI to generate text on different topics.
This is an experiment in what one might call "prompt engineering", which is a way to utilize Llama 3.1 405b, a neural network trained by Meta.
Llama is a language model. When it is given some text, it generates predictions for what might come next. It is remarkably good at adapting to different contexts, as defined by a prompt (in this case, hidden), which sets the scene for what type of text will be generated.
Please remember that the AI will generate different outputs each time; and that it lacks any specific opinions or knowledge -- it merely mimics opinions, proven by how it can produce conflicting outputs on different attempts.
Feel free to share interesting outputs to /r/philosopherAI on Reddit.